4.  Restriction on wasteful expenses.--(1) No person celebrating his marriage or the marriage of any other person shall serve or allow any one to serve meals or other edibles to the persons in-connection with a marriage in a club, hotel, restaurant, wedding hall, community centre community park or any other place, except "one dish, which means one salan, rice with roti and one sweet dish with" soup or, hot or cold soft drinks:

Provided that one dish may be served at the Walima ceremony to a maximum number of three hundred invitees, including hosts, attending the ceremony:

Provided further that in case the number of invitees, including hosts, attending the Walima ceremony exceeds three hundred, no meal shall be served except soup or, hot or cold soft drinks.

(2)  Nothing contained in sub-Section (1) shall apply to the eating of meals within the house by the members of family celebrating the marriage, and the house guests.

COMMENTARY

Vires of Act V of 2003, enacted by Provincial Assembly of Punjab on the touchstone of Ordinance II of 2000 enacted by Federal Government, assailed. Art. 143 of the Constitution, absolutely make it clear that Act V of 2003, could not be enacted, as the same was in consistent with Ordinance II of 2000, promulgated by Federal Government. PLJ 2005 SC 505.

Walima and other marriage functions prevalent in the society have been made a source of ostentatious display of wealth inasmuch as people spend huge moneys on the occasions of Barat, Walima and other functions which have taken the form of Asraaf (extravagance),  which  has  been  strictly  prohibited  in the Holy Qur'an. Supreme Court while pointing out the evils of such ceremonies observed that it is the duty of the State to take steps to encourage the celebration of marriage ceremonies in simple and informal ways, such as performance of Nikah in the mosque of the locality so that the element of inconvenience/harm was eliminated from the society. PLD 2005 SC 1.

Vires of Punjab Marriage Functions (Prohibition of Ostentatious Displays and Wasteful Expenses) Act, 2003. Supreme Court had struck off the Punjab Marriage Functions (Prohibition of Ostentatious Displays and Wasteful Expenses) Act, 2003 passed by the Provincial Assembly while the Marriage Functions (Prohibition of Ostentatious Displays and Wasteful Expenses) Ordinance, 2000 was held to be holding the field and applicable throughout Pakistan and guests be served in terms of Ss. 4 and 5 of the said Ordinance. Supreme Court directed the Chief Secretaries, Inspectors-General Police of the Provinces, Chief Commissioner and Inspector-General Police of Federal Capital Territory and District Administration to ensure that the judgment of Supreme Court was implemented in letter and spirit and action against those, who contravened the provisions of the Ordinance were initiated promptly. PLD 2005 SC 186.