REVISITING
By:
RAI
MUHAMMAD SALEH AZAM
In
(i) Article 6 of the Constitution of the Islamic
(ii) The High
Treason (Punishment) Act, 1973 (the "Treason Act").
Additionally, Chapter VI
(Offences against the State), comprising Sections 121 to 130, of the Pakistan
Penal Code, 1860 (the "PPC") prescribes certain criminal offences
against the State without using the nomenclature of “treason" or
"high treason."
Article 6 of the
Constitution reads:
6. High
Treason.
(1) Any
person who abrogates or subverts or suspends or holds in abeyance, or attempts
or conspires to abrogate or subvert or suspend or hold in abeyance, the
Constitution by use of force or show of force or by any other unconstitutional
means shall be guilty of high treason.
(2) Any
person aiding or abetting or collaborating with the acts mentioned in clause
(1) shall likewise be guilty of high treason.
(2A) An act of high treason mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2)
shall not be validated by any Court including the Supreme Court and a High
Court.
(3) Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)
shall by law provide for the punishment of persons found guilty of high
treason.
Section 2 of the
Treason Act, promulgated pursuant to Article 6(3) of the Constitution, reads:
"A person who is found
guilty--(a) of having committed an act of abrogation or subversion of a constitution
in force in
Furthermore,
Section 3 of the Treason Act provides: “
It is,
therefore, clear that, in
Apart from being
limited in its scope and ambit, the high treason law in
High treason, as
a concept, is an act against the State, not a government. Abrogation of the
Constitution or the overthrow of a government are only
two of many perceivable acts of treason. Indeed, there are certain acts that
can be perceived to be more serious than abrogation of the Constitution or
overthrowing a government, such as waging war against the State.
A major flaw in
the treason law of
Such a
distinction between acts of treason and high treason is present in the treason
laws of other countries, including
Although a
discussion of Chapter VI of the PPC is beyond the purview of this article,
suffice to state that some of the criminal offences contained therein, such as
waging war against the State, etc. ought to be deemed acts of treason or high
treason and should be imported into Article 6 with more severe punishments than
provided under the PPC. The crimes of treason and high treason ought to,
befittingly, arise from the Constitution, rather than the PPC.
In view of the
above, it is proposed that the current Article 6 should be replaced altogether
with the following new Article 6:
6. High Treason and Treason. (1) A citizen of
(a) harms or attempts to harm or calls for the harming of the
territorial integrity of
(b) wages war or attempts to wage war or calls for the waging of
war against
(c) engages or attempts or conspires to engage in any
insurrection or insurgency against
(d) engages or attempts or conspires to engage in any act of
espionage or sabotage against
(e) assists or conspires with or attempts to assist or conspire
with a foreign state or its agents in any act of espionage against
(f) assists an enemy at war with
(2) Any
person aiding or abetting or collaborating with the acts mentioned in clause
(1) shall, likewise, be guilty of high treason.
(3) A person
who is found guilty of high treason shall be punished with death.
(4) A citizen
of
(a) abrogates
or subverts or suspends or holds in abeyance, or attempts or conspires to
abrogate or subvert or suspend or hold in abeyance, the Constitution by use of
force or show of force or by any other unconstitutional means; or
(b) overthrows or attempts or conspires to overthrow the Federal
Government or a Provincial Government by use of force or show of force; or
(c) attacks or attempts or conspires to attack Parliament (Majlis-e-Shoora) or a Provincial
Assembly or the Supreme Court or a High Court by use of force or show of force;
or
(d) attacks
or attempts or conspires to attack a military base or strategic installation or
any building or installation under the superintendence or control of the Armed
Forces or the Ministry of Defence by use of force or
show of force; or
(e) assassinates
or attempts or conspires to assassinate the President, Prime Minister, Chief
Justice of Pakistan, Chairman of the Senate, Speaker of the National Assembly,
Governor, Chief Minister or Chief Justice of a High Court or the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, Chief of the Army Staff Chief of the Air
Staff or Chief of the Naval Staff; or
(f) without
lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a foreign
state, any military, strategic, scientific or economic secret, information,
document, drawing, photograph, plan, model, article or note that he knows, or
ought to know, may be used by that foreign state for a purpose prejudicial to
the national security, defence or economic interests
of Pakistan; or
(g) commits or attempts or conspires to commit any act or
omission, or delivers or attempts or conspires to deliver to an agent of a
foreign state any undertaking or promise to commit any act or omission, for a
purpose prejudicial to the national security, defence
or economic interests of
(5) Any
person aiding or abetting or collaborating with the acts mentioned in clause
(4) shall, likewise, be guilty of treason.
(6) A person
who is found guilty of treason shall be punished with life imprisonment.
(7) Acts of
high treason or treason shall not be validated by any Court, including the
Supreme Court or a High Court.
(8) Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament)
shall, by law, provide for the procedure for the prosecution of persons accused
of and found guilty of high treason and treason.
In the context of the current
multiple insurgencies and multidimensional security challenges being faced by
Pakistan and the fourth generation asymmetrical war in the form of terrorism
being waged against Pakistan at the behest of foreign powers and their
Pakistani and foreign agents, Pakistan's treason laws are inadequate and
insufficient and need to be strengthened and upgraded to meet the new
existential challenges and threats being faced by the Pakistani State.
The writer is a
High Court Advocate based in