PLJ 2014 Cr.C.
(Lahore) 271
[Multan Bench Multan]
Present: Muhammad
Qasim Khan,
J.
PITRAS MASEEH--Petitioner
versus
STATE and
another--Respondents
Crl. Misc. No.
1271-B of 2013, decided on 5.4.2013.
Criminal
Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)--
----S.
497--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), Ss. 337-F(v), 337-A(iii), 148 &
149--Bail, grant of--Injury attributed to the petitioner was on the left ribs
of the complainant with the help of sota which was
covered by Section 337.F(v), PPC and maximum punishment of same was five years
which does not fall within the ambit of prohibitory clause--Moreover, there was
a delay of about 18 days in lodging the FIR without any explanation as the
occurrence in this case and FIR was lodged--Petitioner was behind the bars
investigation of the case was complete and he was no more required for the
purpose of investigation and at this stage, there will be no useful purpose to
keep him behind the bars before conclusion of trial. [P. 272] A
Ch. Muhammad Saeed, Advocate for
Petitioner.
Mr. Muhammad Amjad Rafiq, DPG for State.
Date of hearing:
5.4.2013.
Order
Petitioner seeks
post-arrest bail in case FIR No. 257/2011 registered under Sections 337-F(v), 337-A(iii), 148, 149, PPC at Police Station Rangpur, Muzaffargarh.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner as well as learned DPG and perused the record.
3. As per FIR, injury attributed to the
petitioner is on the left ribs of the complainant with the help of sota which is covered by Section 337-F(v),
PPC and maximum punishment of same is five years which does not fall within the
ambit of prohibitory clause. Moreover, there is a delay of about 18 days in
lodging the FIR without any explanation as the occurrence in this case took
place on 24.11.2011 and FIR was lodged on 13.12.2011. Petitioner is behind the
bars since 01.10.2012, investigation of the case is complete and he is no more
required for the purpose of investigation and at this stage, there will be no
useful purpose to keep him behind the bars before conclusion of trial. Resultantly,
I allow this petition and admit the petitioner to bail subject to furnishing
bail bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-(one lac) with
one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.
(A.S.) Bail granted